🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document presents a misguided assessment of Europe. The document asserts that unrestrained immigration and what it terms "woke" policies represent an existential threat to the continent's identity. However, this perspective is based on a fundamental misinterpretation of the reality. The actual danger confronting Europe is not cultural but technological and economic backwardness.

The Stark Growth Divide Between Europe and the US

The data reveal a sobering contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by 87%, compared to a mere thirteen and a half percent growth for the EU. During this time, EU GDP per capita fell from over three-quarters to just half of the American figure. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now has a higher per capita income than several leading European economies like France and Italy.

Today, roughly 50% of the global top fifty technology firms are US-based, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Technological Shortfall: A Critical Problem

This widening economic gap is driven by superior efficiency gains in the US, largely due to technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly American. In the last five decades, 241 US firms have grown into enterprises valued at more than $10bn, compared with just 14 in Europe.

This gap raises a pressing question: As the competition for future industries like AI, semiconductors, and fusion energy, where does the EU stand? Most analysts agree it is largely a contest between two involving the United States and China, with Europe starting at a clear disadvantage.

Root Causes of Europe's Technological Lag

Several major reasons explain this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a much more robust and more dynamic system for financing new ventures. Europe still lacks a true unified investment market, a factor that caps the growth potential of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided regulation hamper European business. A US startup can launch a service under a single regulatory framework to access a market of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a larger population, is divided among twenty-seven separate systems, creating huge market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on risk-taking differ sharply. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's long-term lack of spending in defense has weakened its ability in breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, there are causes for optimism. European leaders are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have begun to propose serious reform. Key analyses on European competitiveness and the single market highlight the necessity of sweeping reforms.

Given appropriate incentives and rule changes, these assets might enable much higher degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent retains significant strengths: skilled human capital, excellent schools and universities, and premier labs. Alongside a large internal market and high savings rates, these elements could trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Importantly, even if Europe does not become the leader in developing cutting-edge tech, it can still significantly boost productivity by adopting and adapting advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

Europe now faces a decisive crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, the continent's technological decline has been gradual. However, without bold steps to address its structural weaknesses, today's gradual weakening could give way to a sudden and irreversible decline in global economic relevance.